1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On May 3, 2016, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Egypt (hereinafter referred to as “Egypt”) as a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Egypt (hereinafter referred to as “Egypt”) and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on June 8, 2016.

On June 27, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute “a sufficiently-founded fear that it would be prejudicial to persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter referred to as “Refugee”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter referred to as “Refugee Protocol”).

On July 13, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on July 13, 2016, but was dismissed on October 27, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The key point of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the members of the Muslim management task group gather the destruction of their facilities, and reported it to the police. The Plaintiff was assaulted from Muslim management task group on the ground of this, and the Plaintiff’s house was obvious to be destroyed.

In the event that the plaintiff returned to his own country, the disposition of this case which did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee is unlawful even though it is likely that the plaintiff might be stuffed by the Muslim type.

B. In full view of the provisions of Article 2 subparag. 1 and Article 18 of the former Refugee Act, Article 1 of the Refugee Convention, and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol, a foreigner who, owing to well-founded fear of being injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, is unable or does not want the protection of the country of nationality, or a foreigner who, owing to such fear, is unable to return to or does not want to return to the country in which he had resided before entering the Republic of Korea.