The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for the first instance (two years of imprisonment) shall be too unreasonable;

2. As long as the Defendant had had had been punished several times due to habitual frauds, etc., the Defendant repeatedly rendered an integrative drinking because he had not completed the term of punishment; the Defendant ordered food while having no ability to pay compensation; obstructed the restaurant’s business without any justifiable reason while ordering food; the Defendant assaulted an employee on the ground that he stated the facts of interference with business in the police; damaged the object in the detention room, which is a public office, or under the investigation at the inspection room; and the Defendant’s liability for such crime is not against the Defendant’s disadvantage.

However, the first instance court recognized the crime of this case when the defendant was committed in this court, taking into account the fact that the amount of damage caused by the crime of this case is relatively large, the victim S does not want the punishment against the defendant, while sentencing conditions in various kinds of sentencing conditions including the defendant's age, character and behavior, criminal records, occupation and environment, and sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the Supreme Court's sentencing committee: (a) the scope of the recommended sentence is one year to two years and six months, and (b) the first instance court violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, which is a single concurrent crime, falls under the basic area of the seven types of violent crimes among military assault crimes, and thus the scope of the recommended sentence is ten months to two years, and (c) the scope of the revised sentence is the basic area of imprisonment with prison labor for not less than one year to six years, since the crime of damaging public goods, which is a second concurrent crime, falls under the basic area of recommendations for the invalidation of public goods of this case among the crimes of obstruction of execution, and the scope of imprisonment with prison labor for not less than one year to six years and six months.

each.