logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.02.05 2013고단3051
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for one year and six months, respectively.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. A. On October 27, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (injury by collective action, deadly weapons, etc.), around 22:45, and around 22:45, the Defendant performed drinking together with the victim B (Nam, 37 years of age) and one other, who is a workplace volunteer in the fourth floor of the F building in Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, with one another. On the ground that the Defendant made a speech to disregard the victim, the Defendant took a dispute with the victim on the ground that he or she did so, and the Defendant was able to have the face of the victim taken by drinking, making it difficult for the victim to take care of his or her head by a beer who is a dangerous object on his or her table, and the period of treatment was two parts, which cannot be known to the victim.

B. In the case of injury and obstruction of performance of official duties, the above B shall be the criminal charge of the branch police station located in the branch police station in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si.

For the reason that he reported the damage described in paragraph B to the police station, he was able to drink B on the ground that he and she was the police officer belonging to the above police station, and took a serious bath for the reason that H and I prevented it, who are the police officer belonging to the above police station, and took the face of the above H on the elbow, and was blucated with the above I's arms.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression and investigation of the above H and I crimes, and at the same time, the victim I (ma, 54 years old), who is unable to know the treatment period, put the right bed.

2. While Defendant B had been in a conflict with the victim A (son and 37 years of age) at the same time and place as the above 1-A, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as fluoring fluor’s face, which is a dangerous thing on the depositor, in response to the victim’s assault, and fluoring him/her over six weeks of face of the victim, and fluoring him/her into the victim’s face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to J, K, H, and I;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. The Punishment of Violences, etc. by Defendant A of the relevant criminal facts.

arrow