logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.04.23 2017나31751
채무부존재확인
Text

1. All claims filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the counterclaim claims filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) in this court.

Reasons

1. The principal lawsuit and the counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously;

This part of the court's reasoning is the same as the written judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following modifications or additions. Thus, this part of the court's reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[M]The third 5-6th of the judgment of the court of first instance: “The defendant was diagnosed by the 3rd 5-6th of the judgment of the court of first instance by the 2nd : “In the instant accident, the defendant was hospitalized in the Furgical team at the seat of the 2nd son, the tension, and the tension.” On June 18, 2016, the date of the accident, the defendant discharged the Defendant from the hospital on September 26, 2012. The diagnosis issued by the above hospital was based on clinical presumption that the Defendant’s sick name “the 6th th th th st st jury of the passengers who were injured by the typhrasty accident,” the 6th st st st st st son and the st st st st son’s seat, etc. at the front st st st st son’s seat, etc., and the st st st stale and the two st st st st st.

It shall be amended to add the phrase “(B) No. 27” to the 3rd 17th 17th son of the first instance judgment.

The 5th trial decision of the first instance court’s 1st instance is the “definite, sacrine and tension, finite and tension, and tension,” which read the “definite, sacrine and finite,” which read the “definite, sacrin and sacrinite,” which read the “definite, sacrinite and sacrinite.”

arrow