Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 16, 2018, the Defendant: (a) opened the back of a victim’s taxi under the influence of alcohol between the convenience store and the victim F, who was a taxi engineer, at the front of the “E convenience store located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si” on July 16, 2018; (b) opened the back of the victim’s taxi under the influence of alcohol between the convenience store and the victim, who was going at the convenience store, discovered it, and asked the victim “I are married to the vehicle.”

“The victim shall not have any subsequent water.”

“In response to the Defendant, the Defendant confirmed the taxi, and assaulted the victim several times due to his hand, head, and shoulder, even though he gave it to the Defendant.

2. On July 17, 2018, around 00:10, the Defendant stolen the victim’s AE mobile phone, one of which is the victim’s AE mobile phone between the victim and the victim, with the victim’s I set up a bags and a mobile phone on the street table, in front of the H convenience store located in Seocheon-si G, Seocheon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement of F, C, and I;

1. Mobile phone or on-site photographs;

1. CCTV video CDs;

1. A report on investigation (a photograph of thief).

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of report on intention (the call of a witness J);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 of the Criminal Act (a point of violence), and the selection of each fine for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is obvious, the defendant denies each of the crimes of this case and instead does not recognize his responsibility; under the influence of alcohol, it is highly likely to exercise his responsibility to the victim F without any particular reason; the method and degree of exercising tangible power is also not easy; the defendant's attitude was inappropriate after the occurrence of the theft crime; the recovery of stolen damage was performed; and other records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, environment, criminal history, type and amount of the stolen damage; and the circumstances after the crime including the attitude in this Court.