logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.01.10 2019나51825
물품대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: “5,277,974 won” in the second sentence of the second sentence of the first instance judgment, “5,277,974 won,” and “20,078,809 won, in collusion with G, a person in charge of the Defendant’s purchase, requesting the Plaintiff to make a false withdrawal of the amount of the funds of the first instance judgment,” and the same is as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following changes, from the second to the fourth sentence of the second sentence of the second sentence of Article 20 of the Civil Procedure Act.”

In full view of the contents of evidence Nos. 2, 3, 5, 7, and 13 (including each number in the case of serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and some testimony of witness G of the first instance court, the court below ordered the Plaintiff after review by the purchasing department upon the Defendant’s request. If the Plaintiff delivers the ordered body to the Defendant, the court below ordered the Plaintiff to pay the kind, quantity, and condition of the body of the Plaintiff. The court below confirmed the type, quantity, and condition of the body of the Plaintiff, the Defendant’s main bank, the main worker’s employees, etc., and signed on the Plaintiff’s column of acceptance of each transaction list (the type, quantity, total balance, sales amount, and the present balance, etc. of the body of the Plaintiff) that the Plaintiff brought, based on such transaction list, the Plaintiff’s customer director (Evidence No. 3) was obligated to pay the Plaintiff the remaining amount of the Plaintiff’s testimony to the Plaintiff on Sep. 24, 2014.

arrow