1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is added to the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance; (b) the second part is as follows; (c) the second part is as follows; (d) the second part is as follows; (c) the third part is as follows; (d) the third part is as follows; (e) the third part is as follows; (e) the third part is as follows; (e) the third part is as follows; (e) the Plaintiff and the Defendants are as Plaintiff; (e) the third part is as follows; (g) the third part is as follows; and (g) the third part is as to the Plaintiff and the Defendants are as follows; and (v) the third part is as to the fourth part through the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the third part is used as follows.

2. Additional part of “C. The Defendant’s negligence on the part of the Plaintiff as to the instant accident is attributable to his duty of care for safety, and thus, the Defendant is obliged to limit the Defendant’s liability. However, in light of the circumstances surrounding the instant accident, etc., it is difficult to see that the Plaintiff was negligent in relation to the instant accident, and therefore, the Defendant’

3. The part of the estimated medical expenses claimed that “B. The plaintiff asserts that the future medical expenses will be required for 2,880,000 won (i.e., once a week 20,000 won x 4 weeks x 12 months x 3 years). The expected amount of damages, such as the future medical expenses, if the expected period has already expired at the time of the conclusion of the arguments at the fact-finding court, the damages for the past part may be compensated only for the actual damages. Thus, if the expected medical expenses have already been spent at the time of the conclusion of the arguments at the fact-finding court, if not, whether such expenses would be incurred at the time of the conclusion of arguments at the time of the arguments at the fact-finding court, then the damages for future medical expenses shall be calculated by considering whether such expenses will be incurred in the future (see Supreme Court Decisions 98Da51831, Feb. 26, 199; 9Da32, Mar. 22, 201