A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 29, 2018, the Defendant: (a) while under the influence of alcohol in front of C’s house in a pushed-si B, the Defendant: (b) committed assault, such as assaulting the said E, by hand, on three occasions, the chest of the said E, while taking a breath and taking a bath to the Defendant, when the security guards belonging to the smuggling Police Station D commander called out upon receiving the report of the said C 112, soliciting the Defendant to invalid; (c) while doing so, the Defendant took three times the chest of the said E, and doing his/her behavior, citing his/her hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who is a police official, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported case E-12.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to E and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person who has been subject to special sentencing) of Type 1 (Interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) [Determination of sentence] The sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., shall be determined within the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines, taking into account the following factors: