logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.28 2014고단9824
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:20 on November 18, 2014, the Defendant driven a Dsan Pack-in car under the influence of alcohol content 0.114% in a state of alcohol with approximately 1.5km from the main point of “dive spoke-1” located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 450-1 to the C history.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by DD Driving) is a person engaging in driving a D acid car.

At around 01:20 on November 18, 2014, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol as described in paragraph (1), driven a car in the above Pacacin zone, and driven the Cacin distance in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government along the two-lanes of the four-lanes from the internal control area to the cac apartment room.

At the time, the signal at the front is night, and in such cases, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as accurately manipulating the steering gear, brakes, etc. according to the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this, while driving in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking and driving in violation of the stop signal, and went through the crosssection by the Defendant’s right-hand side of the driver’s seat of the victim E(the age of 41) who was driving in the direct right-hand side of the air exhauster in accordance with the straight line at the right-hand side of the Defendant’s running direction, conflict with the front part of the driver’s seat of the victim G(the age of 44) who was waiting in the traffic at the one-lane of the road adjacent to the Defendant’s driving direction, and conflict with the front part of the victim I(the age of 62) who was waiting in the traffic at the two-lane.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s injury to the victim E, who was on board the benz’s car due to the above occupational negligence, such as multi-diversous flocks for about four weeks of medical treatment, and the victim K.

arrow