The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Sentencing sentencing on the gist of reasons for appeal

2. The lower court determined the sentence within the sentencing criteria by taking into account the favorable circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, background, means and consequence, etc., as a single repeated crime, the fact that the same offense was committed several times, the risk of intrusion, etc. was committed, the confession and the difficulty of circumstances, etc., and comprehensively taking into account the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, circumstances, means and consequence, etc.

The appellate court, compared to the first instance court, has no change in the conditions of sentencing, and the first instance sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect the first instance sentencing judgment.

It is recognized that the defendant's depth reflects the defendant's depth, the head of the accident after the head of the accident is not good due to the aftermath, etc., the contact with his family, the fact that the crime of this case was caused by his living alone and living together with his family, and the amount of damage is not much.

However, in full view of the fact that damage has not been recovered at all, and that the punishment determined by the court below falls under the lowest limit of the sentencing guidelines, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

The sentencing conditions mentioned above have been significantly changed in the trial.

There are no circumstances to see.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.