A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates G in G in Gari-si.

On March 6, 2011, the Defendant, along with the victim D, E, and F, entered into a business agreement with the victim, in charge of the victim’s purchase price, E, E procurement, and F, facility investment, such as a water tank for storage of stolen fish, respectively, and the Defendant, as a representative of the place of business and the partner, is responsible for and manage all the duties inside and outside the country as a representative of the business, and is to enter into a business agreement with the partners from time to time.

On March 8, 2011, the Defendant received KRW 15 million from the victim D to the Agricultural Cooperative account under the name of the Defendant for business expenses, etc., and embezzled for the victim under the said business contract by voluntarily consuming the said C employee’s salary, credit card payment, credit card payment, etc. in the same day, in the same day, the same day, which is not related to the said business contract.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (Consideration to reflect the violation and the absence of force to commit the same kind of crime);