logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.09.17 2014고단2375
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with business;

A. At around 11:30 on October 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 11:30 on October 21, 2014, the Defendant went to the Ecafeteria of the Victim D’s operation, and provided meals to the victim; (b) 300,000 won or less of 300,000 won in the amount of the head of the Tong; (c) she believed that she was unable to make a horse; (d) she would die and die with the driver; and (d) four customers who were in the said cafeteria, sent the Defendant to the said cafeteria by having the said customers go to the restaurant; and (d) she returned to the Defendant’s house and prevented the victim from using the said cafeteria by blocking the gas valve installed in the cafeteria of the said cafeteria; and (e) she returned to the cafeteria; and (e) she prevented the victim from using the cafeteria in the cafeteria.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

B. At around 23:00 on October 22, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at a H restaurant operated by the victim G in Seojin-gu, Seojin-gu; (b) on the side of the entrance of the kitchen, the Defendant, who is viewed as the urine at the entrance of the kitchen, had the Defendant take a bath with the large sound called “ how the victim would see the urine in the kitchen; (c) whether the victim would be able to stilt it; (d) whether she would be stilt and sing up; (e) the victim; and (e) the victim was able to take a bath; and (e) the Defendant continued to take a bath in the restaurant even if the non-resident in the name at the restaurant was aware of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. Damage to property;

A. On October 23, 2014, around 11:00 on October 23, 2014, the Defendant came to be a restaurant operated D by the victim as stated in paragraph 2(a) of Article 2, and the Defendant: (a) placed a cafeteria and a restaurant door in his/her hand; and (b) damaged the entrance of the victim by breaking the cafeteria and a restaurant, thereby damaging the entrance of the victim to cover approximately KRW 120,000,000 in repair cost.

B. At around 16:10 on October 23, 2014, the Defendant was the victim before the restaurant operated by the above victim D.

arrow