logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2021.01.15 2019구합85614
정보공개거부처분취소
Text

1. Paragraph 2-A of the Attached Information List 2, written by the Defendant against the Plaintiff on October 16, 2018;

(c)be set forth in paragraphs (e) through (e);

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On January 16, 2018, the Plaintiff received a civil petition for a citizen questioning and requested the following (hereinafter “instant case”) to inspect and investigate police officers.

On May 27, 2015, the contents of civil petition: On the backway near Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the driver of the police station, who was under the influence of the driver's license, was informed of the driver's face and head of the vehicle, and the police officer of the police officer, who was under the influence of the driver's license, abused the plaintiff's face and head. The police officer of the police station, who was under the influence of the driver's license, did not notify the plaintiff of the right to refuse.

On April 9, 2018, the Defendant: (a) conducted an inspection of the interview on the civil petition by sea; and (b) committed assault against the Plaintiff by the dispatched police officers.

Although it can not be readily concluded, it responded to the result of civil petition treatment with the purport that it is recognized that there was a procedural violation, such as not receiving a written consent for voluntary accompanying, and thus requires two police officers in mobilization to take measures. On September 30, 2018, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to disclose information on the information stated in the attached information list.

On October 16, 2018, the Defendant disclosed to the Plaintiff the information set forth in the attached Table’s list as to paragraphs 1 and 4, and as to paragraphs 2, 3, and 5, the following information was closed to the public (hereinafter 2-A);

C. The information described in paragraphs (a) through (e) refers to “the instant information,” and the disposition pertaining thereto is referred to as “the instant disposition,” . B. B, C slope submission, and paragraphs (a) and (c) related to the written response.

subsections, d.

The written reply of the Appellants (B and C) related to this paragraph is an information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9(1)5 and 6 of the Act on the Disclosure of Information by Public Institutions. The number of people aboard the police station for the final escort of the police station is no objective data.

3. A scheduled response by the relevant malicious police station, which is information held in the patrol log, log-related to the report log, and information held in the relevant police station, to answer;

5. Other inspection records relating to the above case, and public institutions.

arrow