logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2020.03.05 2019고단655
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and eight months.

The defendant is an applicant for compensation of KRW 320,000, and the defendant is an applicant for compensation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 655"

1. On July 4, 2018, the Defendant against the victim D calls from the F apartment G, the Defendant’s residence located in E, which is the Defendant’s residence, to the victim, thereby making a false statement to the effect that “I will immediately repay money after the second month, if I would lend money to the victim if I would have to pay money in lieu of each type due to the error of payment, if I would have to pay 20 million won.”

However, the Defendant was thought to use money as gambling funds when borrowing money from the victim without any funeral services, and there was no particular property or income in addition to the monthly wage of approximately KRW 4 million received as a HEU member. The Defendant had no intention or ability to repay money to the victim even if she borrowed money from a bank or a lending company, even if she borrowed money from the victim due to the fact that the amount borrowed from the bank or the lending company exceeds KRW 90 million.

Ultimately, on July 5, 2018, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 20 million from the I bank account (J) in the name of the Defendant on July 5, 2018 to the victim, and acquired it by deceiving KRW 98,50,000,000 in total on seven occasions, as shown in the annexed Table 1, until September 11, 2018.

2. On December 20, 2018, the criminal defendant against the victim K calls to the victim K at the victim’s residence, and falsely speaks that “I would receive money from the victim’s family in Korea or her mother, and would receive money from the victim’s family, if I lend KRW 180,000,000 to the victim’s family.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any money to be paid to friendly-gu and was thought to use the money as gambling funds upon borrowing the money to the victim. It did not have any property or income, other than the monthly wage of about 4 million won received as a member of HEU and did not have any other property or income. The Defendant had no intention or ability to repay the money to the victim even if she borrowed the money from the bank and the lending company, since the amount exceeds KRW 90 million.

Nevertheless, the Defendant.

arrow