Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who has no fixed occupation.
The Defendant was aware of the victim D, who was a victim of the same church while attending the “C church”.
In fact, the defendant was under bad credit standing, and there was no intention or ability to repay money even if he borrowed money from the injured party because there was no particular hospitalization or property, such as not operating the fireworks in the Osan of Gyeonggi-do.
Nevertheless,
1. On August 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around the victim’s house of Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City E Apartment 146 dong 1305, the Defendant: (b) purchased the fireworks from the offline of the bus terminal in Gangnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and sold the fireworks to the victim; (c) paid a penalty surcharge to the victim by lending the money that he/she owns as security the vehicle on the wind regulated by the illegal building from the outside viewing; and (d) paid the money that he/she has to recover the vehicle; and (e) paid the money that he/she has to complete; and (e) he/she has to lend the money that he/she has to pay with the proceeds.
“A false statement was received from the injured party, i.e., KRW 4 million in the name of the borrowed money, on the spot.”
2. On September 7, 2015, the Defendant shall pay the victim KRW 400,000 per month interest rate of KRW 10,000,000,000,000 in total, to the victim at the place specified in the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as “6 million”). The principal shall be repaid by December 30, 2015, with the interest rate of KRW 10,000,000 per month.
‘Falsely speaking to the purport that it was a victim and received a passbook from the victim in the name of the victim on the same day from the bank, etc. located in the Dobong-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on the same day by transferring the same amount from the account under the name of the victim to the account in the name of the defendant's children to the account in the name of the defendant's children on several occasions.
3. On September 21, 2015, the Defendant continued to borrow money from the victim at the place specified in paragraph 1 at around September 21, 2015, to the effect that the interest burden is high for the victim to borrow money from F who attends the same church.