All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal (in each of the two cases, an unreasonable sentencing decision) by the lower court is too heavy or too unfasible.

2. We examine both the judgment and the prosecutor’s allegation of unreasonable sentencing.

A. The lower court determined a sentence by comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances and the matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act. A person under way: A person who is committed a repeated crime during the period of repeated crime: The fact that he/she was found to have not been agreed with the victim and that he/she did not recover from damage, etc.: The fact that he/she is contrary to the recognition of the crime.

B. On the other hand, the grounds for unfair sentencing alleged by the Defendant and the prosecutor are already taken into account in determining the punishment, and accordingly, the lower court’s punishment determined thereon is within the scope of discretion and appropriate.

In addition, there is no reason to judge that the sentencing conditions have changed in the trial.

Therefore, both the defendant and prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing is rejected.

3. The appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor in conclusion is groundless, and all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition