beta
Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 37,665,046 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from September 10, 2016 to June 20, 2018.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. On September 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assaulting the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff did not take one’s own part in the drinking place with other people in the street room located in the Daejeon Seodong-gu C, Daejeon on the ground that the Plaintiff did not take one’s own part in the drinking place; and (b) on the ground that the Plaintiff was refused to take alcohol, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the injury of the Plaintiff’s external wound, etc. (hereinafter “the instant injury”).
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is above.
Since the plaintiff suffered the injury of this case as stated in the subsection, it is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages incurred by the plaintiff.
2. In principle, a period of time for calculating the scope of liability for damages shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 10 shall be discarded;
The current price calculation at the time of the accident shall be based on the discount method that deducts interim interest at the rate of 5/12 per month.
In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.
Personal information 1), maximum working age, income: Statement in the column for basic matters in the attached Form for calculating the amount of damages and on the daily income column (the monthly income of the plaintiff is based on the urban daily wage.
2) In full view of the reasoning of the argument as a result of the physical examination of the Plaintiff’s disability and labor ability loss rate and the head of the king University Hospital Hospital in this Court, the Plaintiff lost 26% labor ability on a permanent basis due to both sides’s ear, chronic ear infection on the left-hand side, chronic ear infection of the right-hand ear, etc., and the Plaintiff had already been proneed or serious stymatitis before the instant injury, and the Plaintiff had already been aware that the degree of contribution to the symptoms of the said king was 35%.
Taking account of the king evidence.