logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.07.22 2019가단516529
공유물분할
Text

1. The remainder of each real estate listed in the separate sheet after deducting the cost of the auction from the proceeds of the auction;

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiff and the defendants are his father, father, father and mother, and children of the network J.

Upon the death of the deceased on February 17, 2013, the Plaintiff, Defendant B, and C filed a claim for partial acceptance from the Seoul Family Court 2014D, E, F, G, and H against the remaining Defendants and the deceased J. on November 10, 2016, the Seoul High Court appealed to the Seoul High Court 2016B293. On December 24, 2017, the deceased on December 24, 2017, and the Court 10: (a) received the aforementioned list 1,4,7 through 23 from the above court; (b) received the said list No. 892m2, Gwangju Mine-gu mining area L14, M&M, 95m2, E-U and 80m2; (c) received the reappeal on April 18, 2018 from the said court; and (d) received the said list No. 1, 2018m2, Gwangju-U. Gwangju-U. M. 168m2, Dong-U.

The Plaintiff and the Defendants completed the registration procedure for transfer of ownership based on the division of inherited property as of October 11, 2018, according to each share ratio indicated in the separate sheet of co-ownership in the separate sheet of co-ownership with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet of the same case (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”).

Until the closing date of the argument in this case, there was no special agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants on the prohibition of partition of the common property, and there was no agreement on the method of partition of each real property

[Ground of recognition] As to Defendant B, C, D, and G: The fact that there is no dispute against the remaining Defendants, each of the evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including the number of branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleading, and the fact that there was a claim for partition of co-owned property by this court.

arrow