logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2016.09.08 2016누11023
부당해고인정판정취소 청구의소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the defendant and the defendant assistant intervenor are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be those resulting from the participation in the appeal;

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: “Article 4(1)5” and “Article 4(1) proviso of Article 4(1)5” in Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance; “Defendant’s assertion” in Part 4 through Article 4(1)5; “Defendant’s assertion” in Part 4; “Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s 4 and 5 under Part 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows; “Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s 4 and 5” in Part 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows; “Defendant’s Appellant’s 4 and 5” in Part 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows; “Once the period of the first instance judgment expires” in the main sentence of Article 4(1)5 and Article 4(2)1 of the Civil Procedure Act, “after 2012,” “after 30 years and 14 years” in the first instance judgment of the same Table is as follows.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the defendant and the defendant assistant intervenor are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow