logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.01.08 2014고정660
문화재수리등에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A and B Co., Ltd. shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million.

Defendant

A. A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. From June 3, 2013 to December 19, 2013, the Defendant leased C’s cultural heritage repair engineer qualification certificate to use C, by leasing cultural heritage repair engineer qualification certificate from C, who is a cultural heritage repair engineer in the field of repair, to four sites of cultural heritage repair work, such as G repair work, H repair work, I repair work, and J repair work, which was ordered by B, and posting C as a field agent in document form.

B. From February 1, 2013 to October 23, 2013, the Defendant leased and used K’s cultural heritage repair engineer qualification certificate by leasing the cultural heritage repair engineer qualification certificate from K, which is a cultural heritage repair engineer in the field of repair, and placing K in four sites of repair works, such as L repair works, M repair works, N repair works, and O repair works, which were received by B, in document form.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. leased and used each cultural heritage repair engineer qualification certificate from C and K with respect to the Defendant’s duties at the date, time, place, as described in the foregoing paragraph (1).

3. From June 3, 2013 to December 19, 2013, the Defendant leased the cultural heritage repair engineer qualification certificate to A, such as having A formally assign the Defendant to the four cultural heritage repair work site where B corporation received orders using the Defendant’s cultural heritage repair engineer qualification certificate in the field of repair and maintenance work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Partial statement of the witness K in the court;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused A and C by the prosecution;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against Defendant A and C;

1. Domestic History Report - Attachment of Suspect K site assignment marks, investigation reports -

arrow