The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from February 2007 to June 22, 201, was working as the chairman of the Gyeonggi-do Committee for Self-Governing Apartment Management of the Gandong, Gancheon-gun.

1. On January 7, 2012, around 15:00 on January 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) placed in the front of the entrance of the management office administered by D, the chairman of the Autonomous Apartment Management Committee of Gyeongdong-gun, Gyeongdong-gun, Gyeongbuk-do; (b) laid down the key devices for correction; and (c) intruded the structure managed by others.

2. On June 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 15:00 on June 16, 2013, the 15:00, the key business operator, in front of the Smarket entrance managed by D, the chairman of the said apartment apartment management committee, was laid down a correction device, and intruded into the structure managed by others.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and D;

1. CCTV screens ( current status of intrusion of suspects);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on receipt of replacing the senior;

1. Relevant Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day);

1. Judgment on the assertion of a defendant or defense counsel under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the background leading to the instant case, the degree of damage therefrom, the defendant's previous conviction, etc.)

1. Claims by the defendant and defense counsel;

A. In relation to the intrusion on January 7, 2012, the Defendant demanded D’s representative meeting, and D said D said D said D said D as “mast,” thereby entering the management office of this case. Thus, it does not go against the manager’s will. Even if it is not so, the Defendant has a legitimate authority to enter the management office as the representative, and with the consent of the representative, to hold the said office.