(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.09.26 2018고단9023

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.09.26 2018고단9023

공무집행방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 21, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for special intimidation at the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the said sentence on July 30, 2018.

On November 11, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City B apartment Cdong parking lot, around 08:49, the Defendant: (b) 112 reported on November 11, 201, stating that “A man who is a person in charge of electricity intends to open his house for the reporter,” and (c) the police officer affiliated with the Incheon Metropolitan City D Zone D Zone D Zone D, which was called out after having received a report from the reporter, to search the Defendant, and (d) the police officer to find the Defendant at the same place as the reporter, and to present his identification card; (b) the police officer to find out his identity card; and (c) the police officer, who was in possession of the police officer’s walk, did not produce his identification card; and (d) the police officer’s personal identification card to request the presentation of his identity card; (d) the police officer’s personal identification card should not be issued; and (d) the police officer’s 1st of the chest; and (d) the chest.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the investigation and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. 112 reported case handling table;

1. Photographss of the suspect by a photograph of the stick and a screen image;

1. Mobile phone screen pictures;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that "the police officer did not assault the police officer, and the police officer's performance of duties was not legitimate". The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that investigation reports (Attachment to the personal confinement status), investigation reports (report on the results of confirmation of the previous disposition) (No. 22).

In other words, according to Article 3(1) of the Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers, police officers have committed or attempted to commit any of the following crimes based on the evidence adopted and investigated by this Court.

참조조문

-경찰관 직무집행법 제3조 제1항

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2016.11.30 2016고단864

-대구지방법원 2014.06.12 2014고단1338

-대법원 2014. 12. 11. 선고 2014도7976 판결

-서울남부지방법원 2012.12.06 2012노1441

-수원지방법원 2016.10.20 2016고단2544