1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 27, 2004 between Defendant B and G, a sales contract with the same content as the attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) was concluded with respect to the 6,570 square meters of H220 square meters of forests and fields H, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, which was owned by the said Defendant, and the 20 square meters of land as well as the 20 square meters of housing.

B. On June 2, 2014, H land subject to the instant sales contract was divided into 1,302 square meters of H forests and fields, 1,395 square meters of J forests and fields, 1,495 square meters of K forest, 775 square meters of L forests and fields, and 1,439 square meters of M forests and fields. The Plaintiff’s mother, the Plaintiff’s mother, was completed the registration of ownership transfer for each of the said divided lands on January 7, 2016 and February 5, 2016.

C. On October 26, 2016, between the Plaintiff and Defendant B, C, and N, an agreement with the same content as the attached Form (hereinafter “instant agreement”) was drafted.

[Based on Recognition: Evidence No. 3, Evidence No. 15 (No. 12)

(ii)each entry in Eul evidence 5 and 6 (including paper numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff succeeded to the rights including the terms of the instant sales contract from G, and that the Defendants and the Defendants did not comply with the instant agreement while requesting the Plaintiff’s land first, and the Defendants did not perform the construction work under the instant agreement. While the Plaintiff trusted the said agreement and paid KRW 50 million to the construction company for the construction work of the Gyeonggi-gu L land, the Defendants intentionally caused civil petitions, such as interference with the Plaintiff and N’s entry of high-priced construction site costs and construction workers, such as construction site costs and construction workers. However, the Defendants did not perform construction work for several months, thereby causing considerable monetary damage to the Plaintiff by committing a tort, such as interfering with construction works on the above land of the Plaintiff and N.

Therefore, the defendants jointly serve the plaintiff the amount of 40 million won for damages and the original copy of the payment order in this case from the next day.