logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.09.20 2017가합2945
구상금
Text

1. The Plaintiff, Defendant A, Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant B, and each of them from September 11, 2006.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

(2) Article 208(3)1 of the Civil Procedure Act (a judgment without a pleadings) provides for the interruption of extinctive prescription of the above judgment amount after the judgment of the Jeonju District Court Decision 2006Da4617 Decided June 14, 2007 became final and conclusive on July 6, 2007.

3. In accordance with the provisions on statutory interest rate under the main sentence of Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Encouragement, etc. of Legal Proceedings amended by Presidential Decree No. 26553, Sept. 25, 2015; the portion that exceeds the ratio of 15% per annum for Defendant B, from October 1, 2015 to October 12, 2017, among the Plaintiff’s respective claims against the Defendants for damages for delay, exceeds the service date of each complaint of this case; Defendant A until July 12, 2017; and Defendant B until July 13, 2017.

arrow