logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.08.17 2017고단428
사기등
Text

Defendant is sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes of the 2017 Highest 428 Highest 201 Highest 1221 decided that Defendant is Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 25, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court on May 25, 2006, and on December 22, 2006, the parole period expired on January 30, 2007, when the sentence was executed. On September 19, 2008, the Seoul Central District Court was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on September 27, 2008, and the execution of the sentence was completed on October 12, 2008. On March 19, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on July 15, 2009.

"2017 Highest 428"

1. Fraud against victim D;

A. On December 26, 2008, the Defendant, at the victim’s house located in Seocheon-si E apartment 101 Dong 403, 2008, would sell the vehicle to the victim with “the vehicle is sold as a used vehicle and the vehicle is required to be purchased as a used vehicle to be repaid immediately.”

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, at the time of fact, the defendant did not sell or sell used cars for long time, and there was no property or fixed income, and there was no financial institution's liability of 10 million won, and even if it borrowed money to the victim, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The Defendant, from December 12, 2008 to February 27, 2010, obtained a total of KRW 47,210,000 on 14 occasions, such as the list of crimes in the annexed crime, from around December 12, 2008 to around February 27, 2010.

B. On December 23, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the SK agency located in Sincheon-si F that “I would not open a Handphone in the name of the party, so I would pay a fee without a problem by opening a handphone in the name of the party.”

However, the defendant did not have any property or fixed income, and financial institutions' debts also have approximately KRW 10 million and they use handphones in the victim's name.

arrow