Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Although the Defendant obtained a credit loan from B engaging in a loan brokerage business, as the Defendant was unable to obtain a credit loan because the Defendant’s credit is not good, the Defendant purchased a heavy loan through a loan from B, and the Defendant intended to obtain a loan in such a way as to obtain a loan by providing a heavy loan as a security and notify the Defendant of the manner of receiving a loan by borrowing it.

On April 2012, the Defendant: (a) purchased the CSP car volume from the Plaintiff’s name-non-stringr with a view to offering the said vehicle as security and receiving approximately KRW 150-2 million of the loan; (b) provided the said vehicle as security and drafted a letter of waiver and transfer of the said vehicle, and written a written consent to the use of the vehicle in writing, etc. in the company selling the vehicle in the Gu of Ansan-si, Ansan-si.

However, when the vehicle was seized due to an administrative fine, etc. on the violation of spirits as the above vehicle was distributed as a large-sized vehicle, the defendant filed a theft report with respect to the above vehicle on September 2012, and hear the horses from the police station around February 2016 that the above vehicle was found, and the traffic penalty, etc. attached on the above vehicle was not returned, and distributed to the large-sized vehicle by B without returning the above vehicle.

Appellant B filed a complaint as a crime of fraud.

On April 24, 2016, the Defendant, at the public service center of the original state police station located in 1, 2016, would take the following day on the date when he/she lent C S-T-T-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S

On the other hand, although the above vehicle was leased without any doubt, there was no contact with B at all from the next day, and thereafter, there was a delivery of state/stopping violation and speed violation notice on the above vehicle, and thereafter, a complaint was prepared to the effect that B distributed the above vehicle as a substitute vehicle.

However, the facts are that the defendant's vehicle B.