logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2014.09.30 2014고단784
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 06:40 on August 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) driven a Category B car under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.185% from the section of approximately 2 km from the 2km-dong, Seog-dong, Seogdong to the same Dobong-dong Bridge-dong.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) is a person engaged in driving a B LV car;

On August 4, 2014, at around 06:40, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was in difficult to drive normally due to the influence of drinking, such as smelling in the state of under the influence of alcohol, and he was driving the said vehicle on the direction of the original police station from the side of the Amphc apartment.

At the time when the signal apparatus is installed and traffic control is performed, the victim C(64 years old) was driving a car from the Dtet Apartment to the same apartment, and was proceeding in accordance with the first straight signal from the side of the Hette apartment to the same apartment, and the victim E(52 years old) was driving a Fbu-type taxi to stop for the air signal from the side of the same apartment, and thus, the driver was obliged to observe the signal and safely drive the car to prevent the accident.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected it and caused the Defendant to shock the right-hand door part of the victim C’s car in front of the Defendant’s car by negligence, which was in violation of this, and led the Defendant to shock the back door part of the victim E’s taxi which was stopped as above due to the shock.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence as above, sustained two weeks of medical treatment to the victim C, and sustained the victim E’s saves of each trend requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment, respectively.

arrow