logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.08.17 2018고정152
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at around 00:20 on October 29, 2013, the Defendant: (b) at around D convenience stores located in Young-si District C, filed a report with 112 using a mobile phone of KRW 900,000,00 of the market price of the victim’s 90,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won; and (c) went

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Investigation report (receiving a list of cases reported, 112);

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that the defendant puts the arms of the victim who intends to report at the time 112, and that the cell phone used by the victim in the process of spreading it was so far as the victim was able to do so.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., ① the testimony of the victim is recognized to be consistent in specific and important parts, and the victim made a false statement about the crime of this case with the intent to harm the defendant otherwise.

In the absence of any circumstances to see that there is no circumstance (the victim has expressed his or her intention not to punish intimidation in this court), ② The victim’s cell phone appears to have been considerably damaged. This appears to be the result of the Defendant’s leaving the victim’s cell phone on the floor by cutting off his or her cell phone as the victim’s assertion, ③ the Defendant left the victim’s cell phone after cutting off his or her core chip (SIM card) and used the victim’s core chip to be inserted into his or her cell phone (the Defendant appears to have tried to grasp his or her male mobile phone number after cutting off his or her cell phone), the above argument by the Defendant and the defense counsel is without merit).

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1.Article 70(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

arrow