The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentencing (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment shows the appearance that the defendant led to the confession of the crime and the mistake, and the fact that the court below deposited a certain amount for the victimized police officers, etc. can be considered as favorable to the defendant.

However, the defendant had been punished several times due to the crime related to violence, and re-offending during the suspension period of imprisonment due to the crime of interference with the execution of official duties.

The defendant was punished by a fine for interfering with other official duties during the period of the suspension of execution.

Even if the contents of the crime were committed, the defendant was 112 reported by a person living together with the defendant and was sent to the police officer after receiving a report, and the head of the rank was removed, and the crime is frighten.

In addition, considering the circumstances of the Defendant’s assertion, such as the background of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the age of the Defendant, sexual conduct, and the record of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable even if considering the circumstances of the Defendant’s assertion, such as the Defendant’s health condition.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.