A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

. On February 5, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on August 13, 2016 at the District Court for the charge of forging private documents, etc., and the said judgment was finalized on February 13, 2016.

1. Forging a private document;

A. On January 6, 2015, the Defendant entered “C”, “D” in the column for resident registration number of the subscriber to the mobile phone, “D” in the customer address column, “B 203 Dong-si 8**” in the applicant column, and “D” in the applicant column.

For the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of a mobile phone application in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations.

B. On January 13, 2015, the Defendant entered “E”, “F” in the resident registration number column for the subscriber to the mobile phone application form, “F” in the customer address column, “B B 203 Dong-dong 8**,” and “F” in the applicant column and sealed the Defendant.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged an application form for joining a mobile phone in F's name, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. Exercising the relevant investigation document;

A. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same time, at the same place as described in 1-A. A. At the same time, he can can file an application for counterfeit mobile phone admission, and then sent the can file to e-mail as if she had been duly formed to I for the staff of H located in Gu Government G.

B. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same place and place as described in paragraph 1(b), cans file applications for forged mobile phone admission, and then sent the can file to e-mail as “H” in the Gu Council-si G, “H” was duly formed.

3. Fraud;

A. The Defendant sent e-mail to the “H” employee I operated by the victim J as if he/she completed the forged D’s mobile phone entrance application as set out in 1-A, at the same time, at the same place as 1-A, and as set out in 1-A.

The defendant shall belong to the injured party.