A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant interfered with the performance of a deceptive scheme’s official duties, and violated the Immigration Control Act, committed an entry into the Republic of Korea and intended to file an application for refugee status, with the intent of entering the Republic of Korea by pretending as if the applicant was invited for business purposes.

On September 2015, the Defendant requested “C” to make a visa available to the Republic of Korea from a single person, i.e., an overseas brokerage hub for false issuance of a visa, with the Defendant’s passport, evidentiary photographs, etc., and the Defendant’s “C” to receive the false invitation letter from D Co., Ltd., an exporter of packaging machines, to invite the Defendant to the Republic of Korea for business purposes. The Defendant conspired to apply for a visa against the Defendant.

On September 17, 2015, the Defendant applied for a short-term permanent visa (C-3) at a Korean consul located in the U.S., located in the U.S., and was issued a visa unlawfully by submitting documents for visa issuance, such as a letter of invitation to the Defendant, a business registration certificate, etc., prepared to the public official in charge of the issuance of the visa, to the effect that the Defendant invited the Defendant from the D Co., Ltd.

Accordingly, in collusion with “C”, the Defendant applied for a visa in collusion with “C” at the same time to interfere with legitimate performance of duties by a public official in charge of the issuance of visas belonging to the Korean consular official who is in two b

2. On September 17, 2015, the Defendant violated the Immigration Control Act entered the Republic of Korea as a short-term ordinary visa (C-3, the period of stay until October 17, 2015) on a short-term visa (the period of stay: c-3, the period of stay) and applied for the extension of the period of stay three times on October 15, 2015 after converting the status of stay and other (G-1) into the status of stay on a total of three occasions, and applied for an extension of the period of stay until December 17, 2016, while the period of stay was extended by December 16, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant goes beyond the scope of his sojourn status and sojourn period.