(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.03.05 2014고단1430

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.03.05 2014고단1430

공무집행방해

Text

A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the above fine is not paid, one million won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 23, 2014, around 04:37, the Defendant reported to the police when the visit was refused, and sought an explanation that it is possible to visit the police officer from the police officer dispatched to the visit.

At around 05:25 on the same day, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, experienced complaints by police officers that did not resolve civil petitions. At around 05:25 on the same day, the Defendant stated that F, who was in the process of the 112-reported case, expressed a desire to “this farb head fark farb far.” The Defendant f, who was in the process of the 112-reported case, sent two arms of F, and pushed down once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning 112 reporting duties and duties in the military.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (in the case of 112 Report), report internal investigation (in the case of 112 Report), CCTV photographs attached thereto, and report internal investigation (in the case of E district CCTV), etc.;

1. The relevant statutory provisions on criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of a sentence, the selection of a fine (the crime committed during the repeated crime due to the crime committed during the repeated crime, the Defendant’s violent force, previous experience, and police force to put in the maintenance of public order, and the arrest of a flagrant offender, etc., should be punished strictly, in light of the following: (a) the police force to put in the maintenance of public order and security has been wasted; (b) the police force to put in the police force to the police force during the arrest of a flagrant offender is bad; (c) but (d) the impulse that the police officer want to put in the custody of him/her in the custody of him/her due to the impulse that he/she would have caused the commission of his/her mistake after the police officer had followed the police officer’s judgment

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

참조조문

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.07.09 2014고정588

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2020.04.07 2020고합7

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.05.16 2018고단109

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.06.05 2018고단296

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2019.02.12 2018고단1250