1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 60 million and the interest rate of KRW 24% per annum from September 23, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

1. According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1-1 through 4, Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff sent 200 million won, around November 2, 2012, around December 20, 2012, KRW 200 million, around March 8, 2013, and KRW 100 million around January 2, 2014 to the plaintiff each month from November 2, 2012 to August 11, 2014, and the defendant would be entitled to resolve the above KRW 10 million (200 million) to the plaintiff on December 20, 2012, KRW 200,000,000,000 (200,000,000,000,000 won).

In full view of the above facts of recognition, the Plaintiff determined the rate of KRW 100 million to the Defendant around November 2, 2012, KRW 200 million around December 20, 2012, KRW 200 million around March 8, 2013, and KRW 100 million around January 2, 2014 as the rate of KRW 2% per month and lent without separately determining the repayment period.

Therefore, in the case of an obligation for which maturity has not been determined, the obligor is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the total amount of KRW 600 million and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 24% per annum from September 23, 2014 to the date of full payment, as requested by the Plaintiff, from September 23, 2014, the following day after the delivery of a copy of the complaint in this case.

2. On the judgment of the defendant's assertion, the defendant alleged that he received KRW 600 million under the name of stock investment rather than the borrowed money from the plaintiff who is the mother, but there is no evidence to acknowledge the defendant's above assertion, and the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. Conclusion.