1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) Defendant Dae-dae Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Man-tae”) is limited to the Plaintiff’s assertion.

(B) On-site B is the Plaintiff’s construction site of macro-city C apartment (hereinafter “instant site”).

(2) From May 2014, the Plaintiff provided meals and received meals as a box of the instant site from around May 2014. The Plaintiff was not paid KRW 47,025,00 (hereinafter “instant meal”) for the food of April 2015 and May 201.

3) Defendant Hodae and Defendant well-dying Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “ well-dying Construction”).

In the meantime, the Plaintiff’s food account book and the form of direct payment or subrogation payment according to the Plaintiff’s food-building account book. 4) The first Plaintiff’s food-building contract was found to be defective and the Defendant’s name was B, the field director of the Defendant’s name, and the Defendant’s name was directly executed on the basis of the Defendant’s well-being Construction, D, etc., a subcontractor at the instant site.

B. In light of the fact that: (a) the food cost of the instant case was incurred by anyone; (b) the details or details of the agreement on the supply of meals to the instant site between the Plaintiff and the Defendants are not sufficiently proven; and (c) the evidence No. 4 was prepared by E, an employee of the Defendant Ma, who is an employee of the Defendant Ma on the date and time; or (d) it was insufficient to deem that each of the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff was jointly and severally liable for the payment of the food costs to the instant case; and (b) there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit.