1. The Defendant: KRW 71,03,710 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from August 13, 2016 to July 19, 2018.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: Urban environment rearrangement project of the C District - Project implementer: Defendant-Public notice of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City public notice D on April 20, 2006, and Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City public notice E on January 29, 2010, and Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City public notice on May 7, 2015, and Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City public notice on February 25, 2015;

B. Decision of expropriation made on June 24, 2016 by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City on the expropriation - The annexed sheet owned by the plaintiff / [Attachment Table] / The land indicated in the column for "object of expropriation" (hereinafter "each land of this case"; "Seoul Jung-gu J" and "Seoul Jung-gu J" are referred to as "K" only) and L, M, N's above ground residential facilities and business facilities (1 floor) and 86.62 square meters per annum, 12.71 square meters per annum, neighborhood living facilities and business facilities (1 floor) and 12.71 square meters per annum, neighborhood living facilities and business facilities (2 floor), 86.62 square meters per annum and 86.62 square meters per annum, neighborhood living facilities and business facilities (3 floor), and 17.64 square meters per annum (4 floor), and 17.64 square meters per annum: The annexed sheet / [Attachment Table] - The amount of compensation for losses for each land of this case shall be increased only for the plaintiff -120.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on objection - Compensation for losses on December 22, 2016 - The amount stated in the separate sheet / [Attachment Table] - The appraisal corporation: Qua, stock company R (hereinafter “appraisal”) [based on recognition], without any dispute, and the evidence Nos. 1, 2-1, 3-1, and 4-1 through 8, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion and appraisal of each of the instant lands calculated compensation for losses by regarding L, M, N, and S land (hereinafter “instant land”) as separate land, but each of the instant lands is subject to one consent.