1. As to each share of 1/600 of the vehicles listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B’s title trust on May 3, 2019.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 8, 2016, the Plaintiff purchased a motor vehicle listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant motor vehicle”) and completed the ownership transfer registration under its own name with respect to 9/100 of the instant motor vehicle’s 9/100 shares. However, as to the remaining shares, the Plaintiff’s title transfer registration is completed in the name of the deceased with respect to 1/100 shares out of the instant motor vehicle under title trust to the deceased D (hereinafter “the deceased”).

B. The Deceased died on September 4, 2018, and the Plaintiff, Defendants, Nonparty E, F, and G inherited the Deceased.

(Legal share of inheritance 1/6) / [based on recognition] Defendant B: Each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings, and the fact that there is no dispute.

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendants succeeded to the status of the deceased’s title trustee as to shares 1/600 among each of the instant vehicles (i.e., shares 1/100 x statutory inheritance 1/6) and the Plaintiff’s termination of the title trust agreement, and the duplicate of the claim and the application form for modification of the cause of the claim, dated May 2, 2019, which indicated that the Plaintiff’s termination of the said title trust agreement, were delivered to Defendant B, May 3, 2019, and May 10, 2019 to Defendant C, so the Defendants have a duty to implement the transfer registration procedure for ownership transfer on the Plaintiff’s share 1/60 of each of the instant vehicles due to the termination of each of the above service date.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that each of the claims of the plaintiff in this case is with merit.