Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (a two-year imprisonment, confiscation) of the lower court’s punishment is deemed to be too unreasonable, and the prosecutor is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair.

2. The crime of this case committed the crime of this case under a prior plan, such as threatening employees of convenience stores at night and putting them over with tapes prepared in advance at night, and taking cash, etc. into account the poor quality of the crime of this case, and preparing excessive, Mask, tape, etc., is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

Meanwhile, according to the records, if the defendant voluntarily reported the crime of this case to an investigation agency even after the defendant was aware that he/she voluntarily surrenders himself/herself to the investigation agency while committing the crime of this case, he/she should be deemed to have committed the crime of this case (see Supreme Court Decision 96Do1167, Mar. 20, 1997). According to the records, the defendant notified the investigation agency that he/she would voluntarily surrenders him/herself to the defendant when he/she committed the crime of this case, and the defendant notified the investigation agency of this fact that he/she would be sentenced to the punishment of this case, the fact that the defendant was arrested by the police station in order to escape together with the punishment, and according to this, it is reasonable to view that the defendant voluntarily reported the crime of this case to the investigation agency.

In full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant agreed with the victim G and the victim victim I, and deposited some money for the victim D; (b) the Defendant did not have any other means of criminal punishment than the Defendant sentenced to each fine due to driving without license or injury; (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment; (d) the background of the instant crime; and (e) the circumstances after the instant crime; and (e) the recommended sentence based on the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission, the sentence of the lower court seems to be adequate and too heavy or unreasonable.