logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.09.12 2018노2199
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant

A All appeals against A and the Defendant B of the Prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court on Defendant A (one year of imprisonment and one year of confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on Defendant B (one year and two months of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of the instant case, even considering the circumstances asserted by Defendant A and the Prosecutor on the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment against Defendant A is too heavy, or the lower court’s punishment against Defendant B is too unfasible and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, Defendant A’s appeal and prosecutor’s appeal against Defendant B are without merit. Thus, it is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure: (a) ex officio pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, Defendant A’s appeal and prosecutor’s appeal against Defendant B is added to “B and” following the second behavior.

arrow