1.The judgment of the first instance, including the primary claims added at the trial, shall be modified as follows:

The plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 1, 1956, E- 9 - 4 - - - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- ----- ------ -------- ------- --------- -------- ---- ----- ---- ---- --- --- --- ---- -- ---- --- -- -- -- --- -- -- -- - -- - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - -------- -------.

B. On December 8, 1971, J of the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the Plaintiff’s land on the ground of sale on March 10, 1965 with respect to C Forest land 893 square meters (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s land”). On February 28, 1991, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the Plaintiff’s land by agreement and division on February 27, 1985.

C. On March 10, 2014, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale on March 7, 2014 with respect to D forest land 595 square meters (hereinafter “Defendant’s land”).

Plaintiff

All land and the defendant's land are identical to the indication on the registry and on the forestry register, but the plaintiff's land is not indicated in the current forestry map, and the defendant's land is indicated as being 2219 square meters larger than 595 square meters in the registry and the forestry register.

On the other hand, the Defendant’s land is a land subject to correction of registered matters under Article 84 of the Spatial Data Establishment and Management Act (hereinafter “Spatial Data Act”), and is currently unable to conduct a cadastral survey.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 4, Eul evidence 2, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, and 2, the fact inquiry and reply to the Director of the Daejeon District Headquarters of Daejeon District Headquarters of the first instance court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. (1) The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) The F Forest, which is the land prior to the subdivision of the Plaintiff’s land, and the I Forest, which is the land prior to the subdivision of the Defendant’s land, was bordered.