Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 2017, the Defendant posted “E” Lone Star Program (D) used by the Victim C’s Women’s Women’s Fluories, “E only fluorcing fluoring banks fluoring at her age fluor,” and “comporing in the case of her fluorcing C” on the same day with the Victim’s Women’s Fluorg (D) used by the Victim’s Women’s Fluor, and transmitted the contents of “E”, “Fluoring fluoring fluoring women’s fluorcing to this account”, “Fluoring fluoring fluoring fluoring fluoring fluor,” and “fluoring fluor.”

Accordingly, with the aim of slandering the Defendant, the Defendant posted false information openly through the information and communication network, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details after cutting down a camera and cutting off a tape, recording, or cutting off a log gram;

1. Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting a crime and Article 70 of the relevant Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. There is a question as to whether the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is against the truth in light of the defendant's attitude in this court, and there is a question as to whether the defendant's reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is against the truth in light of the defendant's attitude in this court. The victim wanted to punish the defendant, and the defendant did not make any effort to recover from damage. The degree of defamation of this case is not easy, and the defendant does not seem to have prepared a threat of continuing contact from the victim, as alleged by the defendant, in light of its content and the process of preparation. The defendant filed a complaint against the victim for a crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (use photographing such as Kamera, etc.) against the victim, but a decision not to prosecute the victim was made, and the environment, motive, means, means and result of the crime of the defendant.