beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. (1) The plaintiff is a person who was working as the head of the management office in B (the approval for use on January 10, 2008; hereinafter "the building of this case") who is an aggregate building D in emuli City D, and the defendant B management body (hereinafter "the defendant management body") is a management body established with all sectional owners of the building of this case, and the defendant C is a person who divided the first floor No. 112 from January 31, 2008 to April 24, 2017 among the building of this case.
(2) From July 208, Defendant C was the manager of the instant building from around July 12, 2008 (no objection was raised by the Defendant C before the meeting of the management body was raised from the sectional owners). On April 12, 2014, at the meeting of the management body, Nonparty C, the sectional owner of the instant building, Nonparty C, as of April 12, 2014, operated the 101 to 107, 113, 114, 301, and 401, the total size of the exclusive ownership of the instant building, with the approval of the 1,824.74 square meters of the total size of the instant building (89% of the shares) and the approval of the 1,629.71 square meters of the total size of the instant building (hereinafter referred to as “non-party joint owner’s share ratio”), but the approval of the 1,553 square meters of the total size of the instant building (hereinafter referred to as “15%”).
However, the defendant C continued to serve as the representative of the defendant management body.
(3) Meanwhile, from June 6, 2008, the instant building was managed by Nonparty G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”), and from April 2013, Nonparty H Co., Ltd (J, the wife of G’s representative director, is the representative director; hereinafter “H”) conducted the management of the instant building since it was in G.
On March 10, 2014, Defendant C notified H that it would refuse to renew the entrusted management contract as the entrusted management contract was terminated on June 5, 2014 in the name of Defendant C’s management body.
(b).