The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The decision-making defendant has committed a crime in depth and has not committed a second offense.

The defendant is a physically disabled person, and is responsible for the livelihood of a pregnant woman who is not healthy.

However, around 2006, the defendant has been sentenced to a fine due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and was sentenced to a penalty due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) around 201, and committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime.

At the time of the instant crime, the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration was considerably high by 0.123%.

In addition, the sentence imposed on a similar case shall not be deemed unfair because the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable in full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and pleadings, such as equity, age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.