logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.05.14 2019가단20313
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that runs the business of research and development, production, sale, etc. of wind wind films (the trade name before the change on August 1, 2018) and the Defendant is a company that runs the business of manufacturing, selling, etc. Acrying the Acryle film.

B. On November 18, 2016, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to develop a connection product for the manufacture of automobile wind films, which is a special material for train teams produced in D (hereinafter “E products”). Accordingly, the Defendant provided samples of the “F products” of the connection product of the sponsed sponsing of the sponsing of the sponsed spons. The Plaintiff purchased “F products” from the Defendant on or around November 18, 2016, and sold and sells automobile wind films by purchasing “F products” from the Defendant on or around November 18, 2016.

C. Since November 7, 2017, the Plaintiff purchased F Products 1,260km (price 9,450,000) from the Defendant on November 16, 2017, and 360km (price 2,700,000) from the Defendant on November 16, 2017, and all the products were manufactured by the Defendant on November 6, 2017, and the Defendant also provided test results (in foreign pipes, ancient portion, and point description) on the samples and the physical properties of the products.

(hereinafter) The Defendant manufactured on November 6, 2017 and sold the products to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant F products”). D.

The Plaintiff supplied the instant F products from the Defendant, and manufactured and sold in K and L a motor vehicle window film (name G, H, I, J, hereinafter “instant film”) in a manner consistent with other films, by mixing E products, Soben (MEK, and other materials in order to combine them), self-managed additives (9-2) with products, etc.

E. From the end of November 2017 to the early December 12, 2017, the Plaintiff became aware of the fact that a red white prize was revealed in the film of this case, and the Plaintiff’s employees conducted the test on December 14, 2017, and was red in the film created by mixing the instant F products with E products.

arrow