The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment defendant did not have the record of punishment for the same crime, and the crime of this case was committed with the intention of deceiving the amount equivalent to the price of goods of the play facilities of this case from the beginning.

It seems that the finance has deteriorated in the course of the operation of landscaping business rather than in the course of the operation of landscaping business, and the fact that the above victim is not wanting to be punished against the defendant is favorable to the defendant.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant was punished for other crimes, and the crime of this case was committed by deceiving the victims who are in an unfavorable position such as subcontracting, and concluded the contract of this case after entering into the contract of this case, and it is not good to use them for other purposes. The defendant falsely stated the facts of this case during the investigation process, and it seems that the defendant escaped for a long time without any contact during several postponements of the trial procedure in the court below in order to pay damages during the trial process. In light of the fact that it is reasonable to view that the defendant's mistake is divided and reflected, it is reasonable to deem that the damage suffered by the victims, the size of damage suffered by the victims is reasonable, the damage has not been recovered properly up to the present day, and the defendant's age, environment, personality and behavior, etc. are considered to be too unreasonable. Therefore, the above assertion by the court below is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.