1. The plaintiff's appeal and each claim selected by this court are all dismissed.

2. Filing an appeal;

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is the trademark right holder of each of the following registered trademarks.

(hereinafter referred to as "each of the instant registered trademarks" hereinafter) 1. The filing date of the first registered trademark / the registration date / trademark registration number: D/E/C compositions: household water purifier, household electric water purifiers, household water purifiers, damp-proof apparatus (in household type 11) of the classification of goods: Babs, training equipment, training equipment, training equipment, instruments for home temperature, air conditioners, air conditioners, household air conditioners, household air conditioners, household air conditioners, household habiting equipment, household electric smell, household electric smell, electrical appliances and electronics, household coffee manufacturer, electric coffee manufacturer, electric coffeeer, water coffee, disinfection equipment, and household food waste drying equipment (H and additional registration of designated goods below electric water purifiers for household type 1).

2) 2) Date of the second registered trademark/registration date/trademark registration number: H/F/G composition: Designated goods: Shall be classified into household electric water purifiers, damp-proofs (influences/electrics), rainers, in-service type No. 11 of the product classification; training instruments, penines, household hot-ion meters, air conditioners, air conditioners, household air conditioners, household damp-proof appliances, household electric smells, household electrical appliances and appliances, household coffee manufacturers, electric coffee and coffees, electric coffees, water disinfection disinfection devices, and household electric garbage and garbage.

The Defendant, from September 2014, indicated the following marks (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant marks”) on household water purifiers products sold and leased by him from around September 2014, and used the Defendant marks in advertisements such as newspapers, television, and Internet homepage.

【Unsatisfyal grounds for recognition】Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through 4, 10 through 13 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 22, 23 and 30, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Appropriateness of each of the claims in this case

A. The Defendant mark, each of the instant registered trademark rights infringement of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1, is each of the instant cases.