A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 29, 2014, around 11:58, the Defendant: (a) was in front of the department store located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City, 598, Preamble, Seo-gu, Seogu, Seogu, Preamble, and (b) thought that other people would be influence of one’s own disease, such as leaving home and living mixed without family, and that other people would be influence of their own disease under the influence of alcohol, and that they were fluend with a fluence of their own disease.

The Defendant tried to fire a structure of the first floor above the department store in which the employees in charge of the department store sales and customers, etc. are located with a fluor, using a fluor, in front of the D agency managed by the victim C, the Defendant was trying to remove a fluorous television displayed at the above department store. However, the Defendant failed to discover a fluort C at an early stage and to extinguish the fluort C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation and a report on investigation (CCTV investigation);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Articles 174 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 164 (Selection of Imprisonment with Labor);

1. Articles 25 (2) and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Attempted Crimes) of the Criminal Act mitigated by law;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under the suspended sentence is a crime highly likely to cause serious damage to human life, body, property, etc., and it is difficult to view that the nature of the crime is light in light of the circumstances and contents of the instant crime committed by a large number of store visitors and employees.

However, the instant crime was committed against the attempted crime, and actual damage was minor, the Defendant was committed against the instant crime in a somewhat contingent and contingent manner, and the following was reflected in recognizing the mistake, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant that there was no previous conviction or more than the suspension of qualification, and taking into account the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background of the instant crime, and the means and background of the instant crime.