beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,770,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from October 25, 2014 to June 11, 2015, and the following.
Reasons
1. On October 22, 2003, the amount from the date of loan Nos. 2,780,000 on October 22, 2003: 3,200 on February 9, 2004; 5,000,000 on April 6, 2004; 6,000,00 on April 6, 2005 on April 13, 200 on April 13, 2004; 80,000,000 on April 16, 200 on April 16, 200 on April 24, 2007; 6,000,00 on April 24, 2004; 7, 100,000 on April 24, 2004; 7,000,000,000 on May 10, 2009;
A. The Plaintiff lent 3,50,000 won to the Defendant on October 6, 2003 as of the due date on the date of 2003, and as between October 22, 2003 and May 31, 2004, a sum of 3,418,000 won was transferred to the Defendant’s account under the name of the Defendant as listed in the following table.
B. Meanwhile, between November 19, 2003 and April 26, 2004, the Defendant repaid part of the above borrowed money to the Plaintiff by way of remitting the sum of KRW 3,391,000 to the Plaintiff’s account in the name of the Plaintiff as listed in the following table. On the other hand, around January 28, 2004, the Defendant repaid KRW 2 million by delivering two copies of the KRW 1 million check.
On November 19, 200 5,00,000 on the date of repayment, 19. 5,000 on March 16, 2004; 3. 5,000,700,000 on March 16, 2004; 2,500,005 March 31, 200 on March 31, 2004; 3,000,00 on April 8, 2004; 50,000 on April 3, 204; 7,50,000 on 7, 200,7, 2007; 4,350,000 on April 14, 2008; 4,00,000 on the aggregate of the arguments issued at the Support Center for Financial Transaction Information No. 7213, Apr. 16, 2004;
2. Determination
A. According to the above facts, the Defendant’s aforementioned outstanding payment amounting to KRW 1.7 million (i.e., KRW 3.5 million - KRW 34.18 million - KRW 33.91 million - KRW 2 million) and the following day after the above loan, for which it is deemed reasonable to dispute as to the existence or scope of the Defendant’s obligation to perform the instant case from the day following the date of service of the copy of the application for the instant payment order, which was sought by the Plaintiff, until June 11, 2015, which is the date of the decision of this case, to the day of complete payment, and as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, from the following day to the day of