logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.11.16 2016고정1032
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Doz car.

On June 23, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car on June 11, 201:05, and led the three-lanes in front of the intersection of the lake Park that is linked to the Go-dong, Ansan-si, Asan-si, to a speed of about 30km from the central library to the two-lanes.

In this case, the defendant engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the steering direction and brake system by reducing the speed and properly manipulating the steering direction and the steering system in a way that the signal is installed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to stop that, while driving, received the back portion of the F observer car of the victim E driving, which was standing in the same lane as that of the direction of the course of the course of the course of the collision, from the front portion of the said car operated by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as “satise chills and tensions,” etc. on the treatment days due to occupational negligence, and at the same time, destroyed the above damaged vehicle to have approximately KRW 1,306,238 of repair expenses, and escaped without immediately stopping it and taking measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of E;

1. The result of each fact-finding on the Gwon of this Court and H regular beyond the prison category;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Photographs related to accidents;

1. The CD;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The Defendant of a written estimate and his defense counsel did not inflict any injury on the victim due to the instant accident, and the victim injured the victim.

Even if the defendant did not have the intention of escape, the defendant asserts that he had no intention of escape.

The following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, i.e., the Defendant, without unloading from the Maritime Vehicle at the time of the instant accident, is only the victim’s identification card.

arrow