beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for three months.
However, for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
No person may lend the means of access in return for payment.
1. On July 5, 2016, the Defendant issued at the coffee shop located in the Changcheon-si Changcheon-si, a proposal from C to that effect that “If he/she lends his/her passbook and spophone, he/she will provide KRW 100,000 per month each month,” and received KRW 100,000 per month from C in total the amount of KRW 10,000 per month from April 2017.
Accordingly, the Defendant lent the means of access while receiving compensation.
2. On December 23, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from G to “F” camera located in Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) that “When he/she lends the passbook, he/she will offer two million won per nominal owner; (c) one passbook in the name of the Defendant; (d) one passbook in the H Bank account (Account Number: I); and (e) one check connected to the J bank account in the name of the J (Account Number: K); and (e) one check connected to each of the above accounts; (e) one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, and password for each authorized certificate stored; and (e) one, one, one, one, one, and one, and one, and another, and the part “600,000 won” in this part of the facts charged; and (e) recognized that Defendant B received two million won per head of the Tong (Evidence evidence record).
was received.
Accordingly, the Defendant lent the means of access while receiving compensation.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ legal statement 1 and details of transactions in the D bank account
1. Details of accounts in H bank;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of transfer;
1. Defendants of the pertinent Act on criminal facts: Articles 49(4)2 and 6(3)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act;
1. Defendant B of the ordinary concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendants of suspended execution: The time limit for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is recognized, and the request is made by the person known.