beta
Text
Defendant
All appeals filed by A and prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Defendant A1) misunderstanding of facts does not seem to have clearly withdrawn the assertion of misunderstanding of facts, and thus, it is to be determined on the grounds of appeal. Defendant A does not have any such fact as in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment of the court below against the victim H, as stated in the judgment of the court below, that the part of the H’s bridge was cut back, let the victim H escape from the part of the bridge, let the head go up by his hand, let the head go up on the bridge, let the knick up on the part of the bridge, or the medical device flow up on the part of the head. 2) The punishment sentenced by the court below against the Defendant A (one year and six months of imprisonment and four million won of fine, confiscation, and confiscation) is too unreasonable.
B. The lower court’s sentence (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, fine of three million won, confiscation) imposed on Defendant B is too uneased and unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court as well as the following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence, Defendant A’s act of treating the victim H, such as the part on the victim H’s bridge, as indicated in the judgment of the lower court, took the part on the treatment of the victim H, and caused him/her to suffer from a brush, and divided the part on the H’s head head, who is a brain-disease patient, into his/her hands, and tried to put him/her into contact on the bridge, and the fact that the 3th "the balutic therapy", which is a medical device, flows over the H’s head.
Therefore, Defendant A’s assertion of mistake is without merit.
① The father L of the victim H stated that Defendant A had been witnessed to directly perform the treatment as described in the part concerning the victim H as indicated in the judgment below. L was the sled length of the course, and Defendant A attempted to put the victim H in an invasion. Defendant A attempted to put the victim H away from the floor, and she was supported at the time.